⚡ CFB Dashboard

HolyCityRooster said... (original post) What do you think about that? I feel pretty certain that Loggains is who he wanted all along show more I don't really have an opinion. I'll say this, and I've said a lot of it on the board plenty of times before: I think Loggains did a better job than a lot of people want to give him credit for doing. I thought he did a pretty good job, all things considered. Were there flaws? Yes. But I don't think he was bad, like Satt/Shula. It was unfotunate that the OL stunk in 23 and you had a QB who's someone you want to drop back and throw the ball downfield. The RB situation to start the season wasn't great, but that decision didn't cost anybody a win. Then with a completely different type of QB, Loggains incorporated some "college offense" with the QB run/option stuff they did. And it worked really well for the most part while Sellers was on the field, outside of the Oklahoma and Ole Miss games and a handful of possessions against Kentucky when he kept turning the ball over. TL/DR: Loggains did a nice job of trying to tailor an offense and call plays that suited the QB's skill set.