⚡ CFB Dashboard

- DL: Oregons colapse on defense makes Tosh look better as a DC.

- DL/DB: I agree, think we have the guys to run a traditional nickel but maybe if GP was brought on earlier we would have gone after another safety.

- QB/TE: The second half of Max Brownne's film analysis deals with containing the run game.

- DL: Not "complaining," but neither King nor Waymo can beat it around the edge; that really limits our run game.

- DL/LB: In my opinion, the problem is they keep hiring DC’s who primarily were secondary coaches/players.

- DL: He kept coming back to that "big momentum shift after the fake punt" excuse.

- DL: You can see it with the D-line a bit.

- DL: Nah I just have eyes and have watched the edge play since he got here.

- DL: That's because Lucas decided he wanted to lose weight and be an edge.

- USC cornerback Jontez Williams played 22 snaps against Rutgers, shadowed KJ Duff on multiple occasions and allowed two catches for 17 yards on three targets. He left with a lower-body injury and returned briefly in the fourth quarter. That records his coverage work and in-game return, not clearance for USC's next game. - Deven Bryant played 72 snaps against Rutgers, tied for USC's team high, and made eight tackles. The article cites PFF with two missed tackles and four defensive stops; in coverage, he allowed three catches on four targets for 39 yards to running back Antwan Raymond. Those are this game's workload and coverage results, not a future snap limit. - Against Rutgers, USC's Zuriah Fisher played 19 snaps with no official counting stats, but the article cites PFF with two quarterback hurries. Alex VanSumeren played 48 snaps and recorded two tackles and a quarterback hurry. These are observed transfer defensive-line workloads and pressure contributions, not a newly announced rotation order.

- DL: I truly detest the nerdy little visor look on skinny dude who doesn’t have an imposing bone in his body

- DL: While I enjoy the conversation here, I put more weight on our #12 ranking than on the doom spread by the Riley-skeptics.

- QB/DL: Honestly, IDL looks way better, but our pass rush is still a complete dumpster fire.

- DL: The prerequisites - Can’t give up a fake punt on 4th and 20.

- QB/OL: Schemes do not determine whether a DL has their way with the opposing OL.

- DL: All our top DL guys were for the most part we’re double teamed, so there’s that too.

- DL: Today he looked like a DC who was once great, a step behind and rusty as hell.

- QB/DL: Defense hasn’t gotten to the QB all year except 1 game…and didn’t get there last year either

- DL/DB: Its bananas when it comes to offseason coaches evaluation of portal needs.

- DL/LB: Worst part is everyone knew this yet Bowden didn’t go after an elite LB and safety Disappointing

- Injury: Wafle your a baaaaad dude, but Im begging you , seal the edge next week before slamming down, that QB will play cat and Mouse with you all game!

- Pick/market: I'll take the W, felt like a game we would've let slip away last couple seasons.

- DL/LB: It's fair to be frustrated after today but this is a bit irrational.

- DL: DL fooled us again…everyone thought they were legit after 3 games and now you play someone and are getting manhandled

- DL: concerning to say the least, we just need the W and have the coaches figure it out

- DL: I’m not defending the defense I’m just wondering if dropping the Dl is really a big issue or not.

- Pick/market: To win next week but the good news is it’s not next week.

- Pick/market: Still cant generate a pass rush with the 4 DL.